Voter Nullification

By George Lujack
11/07/2008

Barack Hussein Obama has made history in becoming America’s 44th president and the first president of African-American descent. Cheering celebrations lasted long into election night and have continued throughout the week. Many blacks, who thought they would never see an African-American elected president in their lifetime, are elated. Whoopi Goldberg said afterward on an episode of ‘The View’ that never before had she really felt completely at home in America. It was like walking around carrying luggage, but now, she can finally put her luggage down.

There is no doubt that many blacks and others are projecting themselves, their hopes and dreams, onto president-elect Barack Obama. For many blacks, such as Goldberg, it was necessary for America to elect a black president as a measure of justice and for a feeling of belonging. Goldberg’s salary and a bank account are such that she can afford to hire someone to carry her luggage around. Notwithstanding, she makes a strong point for the feelings and sentiments of many black Americans with her statement.

Is Barack Obama the culmination of Martin Luther King’s dream? Yes and no; only partially. The fact is now that an African-American has attained the highest office in the land, it can truly be said that any man can do anything in America. However, Obama’s victory must be tempered with some sobering analysis.

MLK’s dream was that he would one day live in a nation where people will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. If Obama were truly judged by the content of his character and his associations, and not by the color of his skin, he would not have been elected to the nation’s highest office. Obama’s associations would prevent him from attaining top-level security clearance in many federal jobs, but ironically, because he is the president-elect he will receive such clearance.

Issues did not matter in this election. Of what was the overriding concern with many voters was making history and electing the nation’s first black president. It didn’t matter what Obama’s positions were, who he associated with or even what he said. Voters in this election, more than ever, didn’t even know or care what the issues were, and were voting solely on ‘hope and change’ and skin color. Obama is said to have garnered 94 out of 95 black voters. If McCain had gotten 94 out of 95 white voters, he’d be the president-elect and we’d be reading stories of how America is still a racist country.

Voter nullification, as with jury nullification, is a reality. Call it the O.J. Simpson / Marion Barry factor. Do most American blacks vote on qualifications, facts and issues or simply vote on skin color at this time in our nation’s history? Obama is an admitted cocaine user and has close associations with William Ayers, Tony Rezko, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and others. He will enter the White House owing allegiance to many people of dubious character, which is why associations do matter. Obama is not likely to govern as a centrist, as some are reporting he might, but rather as a far-left extremist, of whom he is. Obama is not likely to unite this country, but will further divide it, as he is the most divisive man to ever be elected president.

Perhaps the mainstream press had other ulterior motives in wanting Obama to be president in that they want and need scandal material to write about. George W. Bush’s term was pretty much scandal free for them. It got tired and old trying to write that Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The mainstream press, who actively participated in the election of Barack Obama, should have plenty of scandal material to write about in the upcoming Obama presidency, that is, if they choose to report on it.

George W. Bush’s ‘compassionate conservatism’ has been an abject failure. Compassionate conservatism entailed expansion of the federal government and big government deficit spending while clinging to traditional conservative social values. It was liberal economic policy mixed with social conservatism.

Now that the election is over, John McCain can stop pretending to be a conservative and Barack Obama can stop pretending to be a centrist. McCain deserved to lose, as he has spent a most of his political career sticking it to conservatives at every chance he could. It is being reported that some on McCain’s staff are attributing his loss to Sarah Palin. Nothing could be further from the truth. Palin will remain a star with a future in the GOP and McCain will now fade into insignificance. Palin was the only reason McCain had any fighting chance to become president as she alone invigorated the conservative base of the party. The Republican Party is in trouble because of the moderate Bush / McCain wing, not because of Sarah Palin or it’s conservative base.

Yes, John McCain deserved to lose, but did Barack Obama deserve to win? Change is coming to America, but Obama’s change is more socialism, higher taxes, government run healthcare, a gutted military and an unsure foreign policy in a dangerous world. America, be careful for the change you asked for, for you are about to find out what it is.

Election Eve

By Tracy K. Cronin
11/03/2008

It is Election Eve and all through the world, the voters are hoping to see their candidate to victory.

The world is watching and hoping for someone new… to restore their faith in the Red White & Blue.

The ideas are all commonly rooted in hope, and when tomorrow comes one thing is sure..

A special day will occur for many…

Whether it be Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream…” finally emblazoned across the skies for all the world to see how great a democracy can truly be; transforming the sorrow and tragedy of yesterday into modern thinking and equality in only a century. May the seas part as America sees only the colors of Red White & Blue. This is why freedom matters, so that the world can improve itself with the voice of the many, not only the will of a few.

Or it may be that the man that lived through hell, while fighting for this Democracy and Freedom we have, will one day take the oath of office for President of the USA. Might he continue his dream of blazing a freedom trail, defending capitalism, and fighting corruption? Where once his voice went unheard in a POW camp, where once his voice went unheard at the bonfire of the vanities in the Senate as he spoke out for campaign finance reform. May his voice one day be heard across the world as the leader of the Free World?

Two very special people who have dreamed of a better America and stood up for a better America are both finally heard loudly and clearly and unmistakably by the world. They are both acknowledged and appreciated by the citizens of this nation. When clear heads prevail time will show many that not one but both were rare and unique people who devoted their lives to public office with kindness, intelligence, and ferocity that warrants the respect of us all.

Tomorrow America will elect a new president that can make a difference.

Joe the Plumber

By George Lujack
10/17/2008

Samuel J. Wurzelbacher, now widely known across America as “Joe the Plumber,” is an ordinary citizen who has been thrust into the national spotlight and inserted into the presidential race in the 11th hour. In the last presidential debate, the number one issue was not healthcare, the war in Iraq, the economy or global terrorism; it was the concerns of Joe the Plumber.

Wurzelbacher is the aspiring-to-be small businessman from Ohio who questioned Senator Obama about his tax plan at an Obama presidential campaign rally in Toledo. “I’m getting ready to buy a company that makes about 250, 270 - 80 thousand dollars a year, your new tax plan is going to tax me more isn’t it? I’m getting taxed more and more for fulfilling the American dream.” Obama responded in classic Marxist fashion, stating that it was okay to tax those making over $250,000, even small businesses making that, because then you can “spread the wealth around and everyone benefits.”

For those who do not understand Marxist belief and philosophy, here is the infamous direct quote from the Father of communism: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” Marxism, when implemented, has failed to work in the Soviet Union and everywhere else it has ever been tried.

Joe the Plumber has suddenly become the face of small business in America. He also represents the concerns of many other hard-working, ordinary citizens who feel that the U.S. government is far-too-often intruding into their lives and punitively penalized them for being successful, while simultaneously rewarding failure. This goes on at the citizen level and is increasingly occurring at the business level as well. Our government is in the business of rewarding, through social welfare programs and business bailouts, those who are corrupt, unproductive and unsuccessful, while penalizing those who are honest, hard-working, successful and aspiring to be more successful.

During the recent Wall Street financial crisis, the government has stepped in to bail out AIG and other failing companies that have brought the economy down through corrupt business practices. After receiving an initial $85 billion dollar bailout, AIG has a second bailout coming to the tune of $37.5 billion dollars. This news comes after the fact that AIG executives spent $440,000 on a weekend retreat!

It might seem shocking that AIG executives could have such a callous attitude towards taxpayer money by spending so lavishly on themselves, but anyone with a small understanding of human nature understands why. They spend this money on expensive retreats, because the money was not earned and was generously handed to them for being a failure. Is there really any difference in mentality between these AIG executives and the welfare mom using food stamps to buy the most expensive brands at the local supermarket?

America has for many decades been increasingly slip-sliding into socialism, under Democrat leadership and RINO Republican leadership. President George W. Bush is being held responsible in many voters eyes for the failing economy, even though it is primarily the fault of liberal Democratic policies in Washington that have rewarded failure in the mortgage markets. Yet President Bush and other maverick Republicans are at fault for compromising with Democrats while failing to use their positions to stop harmful Democrat policies and alert the American people of these bad policies.

Joe the Plumber is a modern day Paul Revere; alerting the public to the dangerous socialist direction that the country is heading. Joe the Plumber has become an overnight media sensation, because with one simple question, he changed the political discussion. Mr. Wurzelbacher, thank you and enjoy your 15-minutes of fame. You’ve earned it!

The Humpty Dumpty Economy

by George Lujack
09/26/2008

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall. Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.
All the king’s horses… And all the king’s men… Couldn’t put Humpty together again.

The well-known Humpty Dumpty nursery rhyme is a perfect illustration of the current state of the U.S. economy and the political leaders who are scrambling to fix it. Instead of king’s horses and king’s men, we have president’s men, congressmen and senators trying to put the American economy back together again. The characters may be different, but the outcome likely will not be.

President George W. Bush addressed the nation on Wednesday night, September 24th, stressing the need for Congress to approve $700 billion of taxpayer dollars to stave off a financial catastrophe, the likes this nation has not seen since the Great Depression.

Senator John McCain, temporarily suspending his campaign and then un-suspending it in time to debate Senator Obama on Friday evening, attempted to scapegoat the whole financial mess on SEC Chairman Christopher Cox. McCain said he would fire Cox if he were president, although the president doesn’t have authority to do that. McCain did go to Washington to put his ‘country first’ and voice his input about the financial crisis and proposed bailout.

Meanwhile, Senator Barack Obama said Monday the upheaval on Wall Street was “the most serious financial crisis since the Great Depression” and blamed it on policies that he said Republican opponent John McCain supports. By Wednesday, McCain was playing Mr. Smith goes to Washington and invited Obama to join him to work on the bailout bill. Obama was not willing to suspend his campaign and insisted Friday night’s debate should go forth as scheduled. Addressing congressional leaders concerning the proposed bailout bill, he said, “If you need me, call me.” Obama confirmed that he is the most experienced senator at voting “Present.”

Congressman Barney Frank, Chairman of the Financial Services Committee, on Friday accused Senator McCain of coming to Washington and screwing up a deal on legislation on the $700 billion dollar bailout package to rescue financial institutions that the Democrats and some Republicans had agreed upon. Frank, a man who lusts after other men, is one of two openly homosexual members of Congress and a perfect example of why morality in politics does matter. How in the world is a rabid, pro-homosexual agenda driven, ‘man’ placed in the position of being the Chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services?

What is behind the financial meltdown we now see on Wall Street? The answers are both complex and simple, more aptly described as multi-faceted. It is the United States credit card economy.

Housing prices, until recently, have been on double-digit increases for many decades, while median wages have had mild single-digit increases or have remained stagnant. American economists have pushed home purchases on the public as an investment that will always gain value. Just buy a house and you will increase your wealth, we were told. As home prices spiraled out of control, banks came up with solutions to deal with the over exuberance of the market-driven home pricing bubble. Home mortgage borrowers, who traditionally paid off a 15-20 year mortgage with 25% of their salary, were now encouraged to enter into 30-year mortgages, then 40 and 50-year mortgages. When that wouldn’t due, interest only mortgages became fashionable.

During the Clinton years, studies were conducted that showed that minorities were being denied mortgages at a higher rate than non-minorities. Thus racism charges were leveled at banks and other lending institutions. Rather than fight new lending guidelines that approved loans to people who were unqualified to accept such loans (based on income and creditworthiness, not racism), banks and other lending institutions cowered and Republicans did not take on the fight other than some who merely voiced opposition, but did nothing substantively.

The housing credit crisis became a crisis because the government, banks, real estate marketers and others treated housing as an investment, rather than a depreciating asset that people needed to live in. So rather than let the housing market ebb and flow, according to realistic market forces, home prices were often artificially driven higher and lending institutions were encouraged to lend to meet the ever increasing home prices.

The dollar continues to lose value because the USA is ever expanding its size, its benefits to its citizens and its global commitments. After the attacks on 9-11 at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, as America entered wars against Afghanistan and Iraq, our government increased domestic spending. Rather than telling our citizens to make sacrifices for the “War on Terror,” we were told instead to live our lives as normal and to go shopping.

Proverbs 22:7:
The rich rules over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.

As our government has over the years encouraged it’s citizens to shop, shop, shop, many have done so even if they didn’t have money. The average credit card debt per U.S. household in 2007 was $9840.

The USA is a debtor nation. The U.S. national debt stands just short of $10 trillion dollars. In this last year alone, the debt has risen at an average rate of $2.32 billion per day! We cannot continue to be a debtor nation for much longer. There will come a day of reckoning when the U.S. will not be able to pay even the interest on the federal deficit.

We borrow untold billions every year from foreign banks, and then dole out much of that cash as foreign aid. In 2007 the U.S. spent over 20 billion dollars in direct foreign aid, sending much of that money to nations that are hostile to U.S. interests. It is time our nation learned that we cannot keep bribing friends and buying allies with foreign aid. You can only pay a whore for so long, but in the end you can never make them love you.

So now the taxpayers are being asked to fork over $700 billion dollars to Wall Street. Of course the politicians feel obligated to give this money to the banks and lending institutions, because these same politicians are the ones who are primarily responsible for causing this crisis in the first place! Furthermore, when this money gets absorbed into these institutions, there will be plenty of campaign contributions and other kickback favors owed to the whore politicians who ‘saved’ the country from financial disaster.

Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall. Humpty Dumpty had a great fall… Let us hope and pray that America’s fate is not that of Humpty Dumpty’s.

Sarah Palin is Raising McCain

by George Lujack
09/06/2008

First described as a ‘risky choice,’ Sarah Palin, John McCain’s pick for vice-president, has become the lightning rod that has awoken the sleeping giant silent majority. Sarah Palin is truly a game changer, as much as there can ever be one, in politics.

During the Republican National Convention, America witnessed the birth of a star. In the Democratic National Convention, the media star sensation Obama has started to fade. During the last 19-months, as more and more has been revealed about Obama, he is no longer the unblemished fresh face in politics. Sarah Palin now owns that moniker.

In most presidential elections, the vice presidential pick does not usually matter all that much. In the 2008 presidential race, the choice for V.P. may weigh much more heavily with the voters. Consider the choices… Barack Obama has picked Delaware Sen. Joe Biden, an entrenched 35-year politician, as compared to John McCain who boldly picked Alaskan Gov. Sarah Palin. If there is one message that Barack Obama has drilled home to the voters, it is that he is the agent of change that America needs. Obama’s V.P. pick belies that message as Biden represents Washington politics as usual. John McCain’s pick of Sarah Palin underscores his claim that he is a maverick out to reform and change Washington. Remarkably, McCain has usurped the message of change from Obama.

Who and what does Sarah Palin bring to the Republican ticket?
* She is a reformer and agent of change, having taken on her own party in Alaska and won
* Some Hillary aka PUMA’s (Party Unity My Ass) Democrats
* Women in general including hockey/soccer moms
* “Small town” American voters
* She has energized the conservative base (both fiscal and moral conservatives)

This election is said to be all about Obama. For the moment at least, this election is also about Sarah Palin. Neilson ratings reported that nearly as many people tuned in to watch Sarah Palin’s convention speech as Obama’s, even though four fewer networks covered Palin’s speech.

The Democratic convention was all about disproving negatives:
* That Michelle Obama loves her country
* That the Democrats are all united behind Barack Obama
* That the country needed to end 8-years of George Bush, even though he’s not running for a 3rd-term.
* That McCain voted along with Bush 90% of the time and we needed someone who was against Bush more that 10% of the time.

The Democratic convention was scant on providing fresh ideas. It was all “Bush is bad, vote for us instead.” Most of the ideas that Obama does have are not new at all, but are clearly relics of the failed Carter administration.

Palin, a Walmart shopping, salmon fishing, moose hunting, gun toting, card-carrying NRA member and hockey mom of 5-kids is the Democrats worst nightmare. She has in 1-short week exposed how liberally biased the media and many so-called special interest groups are. Vicious sexist personal attacks, questioning her about her qualifications and family history have been lobbed at her from the liberal media. NOW, the National Organization for ‘Women,’ is on record as opposing her candidacy. CWA, the Concerned Women for America, supports Palin’s candidacy. CWA has a larger membership than does NOW, but the mainstream media routinely and exclusively interviews NOW, as if they were the only organization that represents women.

CWA clearly advertises that they are a conservative women’s group. It is about time that America understands that NOW is the National Organization for Liberal Women. The same can be said of the NAACP, since they did not support Clarence Thomas for the Supreme Court. They must likewise be viewed now as the National Association for the Advancement of Liberal Colored People.

Sarah Palin should be the heroin poster child of feminist groups. She is the embodiment of everything feminism is supposed to be - a mother of five and a career woman who climbed her way to the top in politics, having brought down some corrupt men along the way. But women claiming to support women are often such hypocrites. Oprah Winfrey’s ratings would go through the roof if she had Palin on her show for an interview. Winfrey, who is in the tank for Obama, has indicated that she will only interview Palin after the election.

Disgruntled Hillary Democrats succeeded in inserting language into the Democratic Party platform that condemns misogyny. Shortly thereafter, Sarah Palin was chosen to be John McCain’s running mate. As leftwing attacks against Palin intensify, it is both amusing and ironic to witness just how quickly liberals act to prove to the world that they do not practice what they preach.

Opportunity For Change, Lost…

by Tracy K. Cronin
08/28/2008

How do women view the Obama/Biden “Change” on an all male ticket?

Obama alone carries the hopes and dreams of many Americans for the possibility of the nation’s first African-American president.

Knowing this… and the deep meaning it has for many, had the results been different, I would have hoped and expected Hillary Rodham Clinton to seriously consider this when selecting a running mate. I would have been disappointed if for any reason it appeared that Hillary might have opted for a “white male” in order to better her chances.

Since the reverse is true… and I am not an African-American, but a white woman… I have been both appreciative of monumental achievement of Barack Obama… but with a serious concern for the female population. It is quite difficult to watch what appears to be two men of achievement, utilize the best female political candidate the United States has ever seen, merely as a cheerleader at the convention to assist them in their win.

So while I will appreciate the support and achievement for some, it is with more than a grain of salt that I will watch the democrats pass on Hillary Clinton. In fact it is to me a greater opportunity for the Republican’s to catch a hint.

To add insult to injury, it also appeared the Vice presidential task force for the Dems, included a Kennedy, who have thus far not only come out strongly for Obama, but appeared anti-Clinton.. as did John Edwards and his dramatic press conference and attempt to create a brokered convention. Neither Edward Kennedy nor John Edwards have had perfect press regarding their treatment of women. I am not surprised, but annoyed at what appears to be petty jealousy of a superior female candidate and the energy used to suppress her exceptionally qualified candidacy.

When someone like Hillary Clinton comes along and sticks with it as she has.. it is best summed up in one word… Opportunity. So as the Democrats embark on their journey toward change and opportunity.. they have just missed their first and best opportunity to utilize the resources of this nation without bias.

Opportunity is not merely about missed chances, it is more importantly about the future and for now. The Republicans do not have a similar opportunity… but if one comes along, it is with sincere hope that they take it.

Kids … Last in Customer Satisfaction!

by Tracy K. Cronin
May 26, 2000 (REPRINT)

The Mighty Oak may not move when pushed. But if every day you chip away at it, something will happen one day. It’s time to chip away and clear the field for new growth.

There are times when I feel as if I am mad, with my inability to fully articulate all that I am sure I comprehend. My comprehension is not fully converted to grammatical expression either on paper or in my thoughts. It is an unshakable, pervasive feeling, of overwhelming unhealthiness, emanating from its source.

The source is the concept of institutionalized learning, dominated by a monstrous dinosaur of a system. It is rife with the structural enforcements of a monopolistic, and communistic system. Its likelihood of disassembly is hard to imagine, while standing in its shadow. But impossible to not contemplate with hope.

The debates on childhood learning improvement, rage on with politicians, educational theorists and parents. The high ideals of change and improvement are often espoused by new candidates for school superintendents and principals early in their careers. School board members often espouse these ideals themselves at the beginning of their terms.

What actually goes wrong is less the problem, because things go wrong with all large undertakings. What is normally corrected, for poor performance in private business, by loss of business, escapes the unnatural education system. Nothing gets weeded out.

“What might have been” has launched a thousand debates. What might have happened in Columbine, if the children who felt they had no alternatives, felt they actually did have alternatives? Perhaps lifting the feeling of being trapped, within an unmoving environment. What might have been if parents of students, who feel revulsion to their forced environment, actually had the ability to make a simple choice for change? What might have been if school staff persons were told enrollments had decreased, and jobs would be cut due to reduced enrollment? What might be the ideas the staff might contemplate? Would they include ideas of cheerfulness, considerateness and shared goal setting with the students exhibiting tendencies to leave the school? Or would they continue with the punitive conduct, where failure of imagination is acceptable practice? Probably not.

Our kids are the last people to get customer service. They are last!

There seem to be two types of parents, when it comes to taking care of children. One example is a time I spent approximately 45-minutes deciding which mattress would be best for my son’s bedding in Macy’s. The saleswoman said to me that she thought it was nice that I showed such consideration for my child, while ordering something average for myself. She told me how there were times when parents would buy themselves exceptional quality bedding, and then order the lowest cost foam mattress for their kids. Hard to believe, but you know it happens.

As a nation, sadly I must tell you, that is what we have done for our kids. We have broken up AT&T so that we could finally enjoy decent service and rates as a result of natural competition. Microsoft is in check to ensure competition can exist. The Berlin wall is down. The most primitive nations have joined the UN. But right here in the US, our kids go to school everyday, entrusted to staff people, who have in most cases never experienced the private sector. The experience that teaches us if we don’t produce results, we don’t get paid for long. The experience that makes a boss or supervisor take the side of a customer in a dispute or conflict, to be sure the customer is not lost. The guidance that teaches the staff, that customers are more than an inconvenience, they need to be pleased if we expect them to return. They are not dispensable, for more than just ideological reasons. Ideas get lost amid exhaustion of day-to-day work. They are instead not dispensable, for practical reasons as well. They affect your bottom line.

In this case the customers we are talking about, are the nations most precious commodity. Our littlest people. The people who will be passed the relay for the future of our kind. We are standing here, letting them go unspoken for. Not negotiated for. Perhaps the majority of lawmakers have exceptional responsiveness from public schools, due to their public positions. Perhaps others are far above the median national income and don’t mind paying for their children’s education twice via private schools. Perhaps most kids are not being represented fully. Perhaps we don’t see that they are.

So, sadly we are taking care of OURSELVES first and our kids are standing on the sidelines. They are graduating with indifference toward their schools. Some are dropping out. That is said too lightly. “SOME ARE DROPPING OUT.” Why would they drop out? What would be their reason? Those are the voices I would most love to hear. It is there that we will find the untold stories of day-to-day occurrences that made our assistance to them usable. That is where our taxpayer dollars meant little. It is there that WE have actually failed them. It is there that we have squandered brilliant opportunities, for the children of our future. No child is dispensable. Not one. Yet at school board meetings I have heard parents ask why children have left school, only to have board members say… “I’ll find out.” Novel idea. It escapes me how that is not the most crucial focus of any managing board. Let’s ask them to fill out a detailed questionnaire about their opinion of the services rendered. What may have changed their mind? And what might bring them back? Because everyone counts.

When a child goes into an administrative office to leave a message for a teacher or administrator who is not in… they are most likely told, “they are not in.” If it were a customer, they would be asked if they would like to have a message taken. Quite simply the normal niceties that you and I enjoy in business, when a company is in touch with reality, do not often happen for our kids. They may occur on the chance, that someone is particularly friendly, or truly inspired. The majority of people simply do not maintain the idyllic thoughts and conduct, like they do when they first undertake a task. Competition keeps people and their ideas from becoming complacent and stagnant.

New ideas and inspiration are not today’s buzzwords in the majority of schools. We are not lauding our kid’s interest like Anthony Robbins would his audience. We are like the Old Russian world of people guaranteed jobs at low pay, who say, “They pretend to pay us… we pretend to work.” Everybody feels cheated. That best expresses the resentment of people who are forced to work with each other. It is a natural occurrence, based on too much control of third parties working relationship. No one truly commits to a choice they have not made, except the minority that are benefiting most. Instead they feel more angst from having so few options. The stage is set for a climate of frustration.

How can we continue to extract school taxes from parents, only to tell them they may or may not get results? They will have to pay twice if they want their children to go to another school. How can we tell our kids that they may not like a school, but life is meant to be that way? That if you put up with things that you don’t enjoy a lot, you’ll be great at doing it when you get older. That’s old. That’s crazy. That’s what so many of our kids aren’t buying.
I recently heard my son tell me that “most of the kids in school were cheating on their tests.” I wonder if most of their parents or teachers really care. Cheating on a test is a concept that should be discussed during the course of a child’s education. They will witness it, but hopefully never see themselves as doing this injustice to themselves. The intrinsic value of the lessons are clearly not the mainstream feeling. How long will we go through the motions and simply not care? When will we put our kids in line for real opportunity? When will we create a structure that rewards ambition and good psychology in teaching? When we do, teaching staff will feel better about themselves and their results. Now we just have lots of kids failing through the cracks. Lots of kids hanging in there, that could do better. Others that are doing well, without their peers all sharing those values. Ultimately, how many scientists might we lose in this century? How many of the sensitive considerate kids, will never consider teaching and the gift that they could bring to children like themselves one day? How many faces turn away in despondency due to what is generally an unhealthy concept? While we stand by and work on other things for ourselves as a nation, they innocently take what they get.

How would a smart CEO of a telemarketing company describe the breakup of AT&T, and the opening to competition? How would they say that has benefited him/her? Glad it’s going better for them.

How would the Nations benefiting from NAFTA, tell you opening up to the global economy has helped them? Glad they can benefit from new options, increased competition, and the solicitousness that just feels right. Good for them.

How does Netscape feel about the power of the Justice Department and the commitment we have to fair trade? It’s nice to see justice at work.

We are sadly taking care of ourselves, our business communities, and our political neighbors, while our kids pass through a system, underachieving and uninspired. We are like the bad parents at Macy’s. We are content to enjoy our own changes for the better, while our kids don’t even know they are getting the least of our efforts. Each day it’s a take it or leave it. Each day there are TV shows on, showing schools erupting with violence and frustration. It is an option-less world for many adolescents.

When we do make the change into something reflective of the new millennium we are in, I would imagine principals and superintendents might be the ones suggesting teacher testing take place. I would imagine high national testing scores might be a goal teachers not only work on, but students achieve. Teachers are people too. They need goals, and they need challenges. They need to be part of the pulse of the real universe. They need to see what being achievement oriented means. Unions should not be their God. Personal results through the progress of their students would be something that yields true benefits, and possibly bonuses. Their minds should not be filled with the idea that their job is simply necessary, in order to continue getting paid. It’s healthy and it makes sense. Teachers, who leave no child behind in passing tests, should be honored most.

That’s what America should stand for. Its children!

Barack Obama ‘Arrogance’ WORLD TOUR-2008

by George Lujack
08/01/2008

For the first few months of the campaign, the question about Obama was: Who is he? The question now is: Who does he think he is?
–Charles Krauthammer, ‘The Audacity of Vanity’ - 2008

Barack Obama has taken his ‘Arrogance’ campaign on a world tour. Like David Hasselhoff, Obama is big in Berlin. In fact Obama, potential Commander-In-Chief, felt that he was so big that he didn’t see the need to visit our wounded troops there. However, Obama found plenty of time to shoot hoops and lift weights during his visit to Germany.

A compilation of quotes, actions and inactions during the presidential campaign are defining for the American people just who Barack Hussein Obama, elitist democratic candidate for president, truly is.

Obama has said, “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for.” Translation: I am the one we’ve been waiting for.

Acting as if the election was a mere formality, Obama gave a few speeches while standing behind a lectern with differing variations of a faux Obama-presidential seal.

Reports of $3-bills circulating with the words “In Obama We Trust” printed on them have not been confirmed!

Where does all this feeling of greatness emanate from Barack Obama? What has Obama ever done to think so highly of himself? What piece of legislation bears his name? At least Cassius Clay knocked out Sonny Liston before proclaiming, “I am the Greatest!”

Mrs. Obama has been quoted during this campaign as saying, “Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.”

Let me get this straight… Obama is never going to let people go back to their lives as usual if he gets elected? Is this a promise or a threat? So what is the great Obama going to do to the people who oppose or do not want to participate in Obama-nation? Lock them up? When these words are properly analyzed, one can only logically come to the conclusion that Obama is trying to establish himself as a new kind of president, one with powers that far exceed those granted the president by the Constitution of the United States. I’ll say it more bluntly; Obama is trying to establish himself as a quasi-dictator. Talk about change!

Obama’s idea of ‘change,’ straight from his own democratic campaign literature, includes the mantra, “We have the power to change this country, and transform the world.” Obama appears to be not only running for President of the United States, but also world leader!

Obama’s plan for change regarding energy is a recipe for disaster for America. He wants no change in America’s energy policy. No drilling anywhere. No nuclear power. Only solar and wind power. Solar and wind are not viable energy options to power America’s existing fleet of vehicles. And we all know that democratic politicians, such as Ted Kennedy, block plans for proposed wind farms when those farms obstruct scenic views.

Obama reflected on the possible consequences of his no-oil-drilling energy policy in a recent speech, “If Iran decided to shut down the petroleum-rich Strait of Hormuz tomorrow, they believe oil would skyrocket to $300-a-barrel in minutes, a price that one speculator predicted would result in $12-a-gallon gas. $12 a gallon.”

Considering that the whole world is increasingly using more oil, and a large portion of the North American continent is not contributing to the world’s oil supply, Obama’s visionary plan to lead this nation to $12-a-gallon gas, all in the name of preventing global warming, may become a reality. $12-a-gallon gas is what America should expect if they elect Obama and keep re-electing the “We can’t drill our way out of this mess” no-drill democrats. Truth is we have oil and plenty of it, but are prevented from drilling for it by many of our elected politicians.

Michelle Obama has also stated in this campaign, “Barack is one of the smartest people you will ever encounter who will deign to enter this messy thing called politics.”

Oh thank you Barack, for lowering yourself to serve us. The American people will have something to say on Election Day about whether or not Barack Obama continues on his world tour.

Identity Politics

by George Lujack
06/23/2008

Earlier in the year, on a TV episode of ‘The View,’ Elisabeth Hasselbeck opined that far too many people were voting for Barack Obama because he is black and for Hillary Clinton because she is a woman. Taking offense to those remarks, Sherri Shepherd proved Hasselbeck’s point and affirmed the primary reason that she is voting for Barack Obama; “But you’ve seen, you know, your entire lifetime you’ve seen people in positions of power that look like you. I, I am- the first time in my life, I am seeing a man that’s running who looks like me.” Hasselbeck replied, “I’ve never seen a politician that looks like me!” Whoopi Goldberg chimed in saying, “It’s a very- and I say this with a huge amount of love. It’s a very white way to look at it.” To which Hasselbeck responded, “Let me take off my “white” goggles.”

Hasselbeck came under scrutiny for publicly saying what a lot of people can plainly see - that many Americans are no longer voting on issues and are merely voting on identity. To be fair, this always occurs to some extent in politics – on the left and on the right as well as with all demographic groups. What seems to be so different in this presidential election however, is that so many people either do not know or do not care where their candidate stands on the issues, be it John McCain or Barack Obama.

When Barack Obama launched his campaign, he portrayed himself as the candidate that transcended race. In reality, his campaign has been all about race. If Obama wins the presidential election, the mainstream media will surely report the event as the culmination of Martin Luther King’s dream. If Obama loses, many in the media will report that America was ‘just not ready’ for a black president. The truth is that MLK’s dream is already alive and well in America and if Obama wins, it will not be because of the content of his character, but will have more to do with the color of his skin. Back in March, Geraldine Ferraro summed it up best when she stated, “If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.”

There are various reasons, other than the issues, why certain groups are hoping for an Obama presidency. Hardcore liberal Democrats generally agree with most of Obama’s far-left positions while African-Americans, the media and the academia establishment see the historic significance of electing America’s first black president. Many African-Americans are projecting themselves, their hopes and dreams, onto Obama. If Obama wins, it is as if they win. Obama has made numerous verbal gaffes during this campaign that would have doomed most any other candidate. To his supporters, it really doesn’t matter where Obama stands - or shifts - on the issues. For them, Obama can do no wrong and he is a true Teflon candidate. In reality, Obama could hold a press conference tomorrow and announce that he is a Muslim, card-carrying member of the communist party and most of his faithful supporters would still vote for him.

McCain has strong support among certain groups such as military families and seniors. There are some whites that will vote for McCain, I’m sure, because he is white while at the same time voting against an ultra-liberal black candidate. McCain’s problem lies with his core constituency – conservatives. Elections are usually won by voting for someone and are not won by voting against someone. Whereas Obama’s supporters are wildly enthusiastic, McCain’s are not. McCain has taken conservative voters for granted, many of whom are not motivated and may not show up on Election Day. Energizing his base may prove to be a difficult task for McCain, who has thus far focused on appealing to independents, moderates and Clinton Democrats while repudiating conservatives - particularly religious conservatives.

One issue that has been resonating lately with Americans is energy. McCain has announced that he is in favor of lifting America’s offshore drilling ban, in place since 1981, while Obama is opposed to the idea. 62% of American’s surveyed in a recent poll are in favor of lifting the ban, while 27% of respondents believe that the ban should remain in place. Energy may be the one issue that can overcome identity politics in this election cycle. The question is whether or not Americans are going to vote with their wallets in mind. With gas prices hovering above $4-a-gallon nationally, many Americans have already altered their driving habits and demand for smaller, gas-sipping cars is at an all-time high in the United States. If Americans vote for more oil supplies via offshore drilling to meet the increased global demand at the pump, it is the issue that could propel McCain into the White House while simultaneously dooming Obama’s candidacy.

The Presidency and the Veepstakes

by George Lujack
05/26/2008

As Memorial Day 2008 comes to a pass, the two major candidates for president have begun the search for their choice of vice president. In what is turning out to be the longest drawn-out presidential campaign in American history, the vice presidential pick of both candidates is sure to be highly analyzed and scrutinized. Being that both John McCain and Barack Obama are seriously flawed candidates, neither having garnered strong broad support from their respective party bases, the eventual vice presidential choice of both candidates is sure to be magnified more so than in any presidential race in recent times.

Hillary Clinton has stated that she will stay in the race at least until the June 03 Democratic primaries. Speaking to reporters in South Dakota, Hillary let the world know of her greatest hope and dream and why she remains in the race, “My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California.” Hillary afterward apologized for making her Kennedy-Obama comparison remark, but I think most discerning Americans know that she is hoping for a miraculous tragedy that could propel her into the oval office.

Considering how badly Hillary Clinton desires to be president and the fact that she would likely rejoice more than any other American at the untimely death of a President Obama if she were vice president, it would be hard to imagine Obama choosing her to be his running mate. It is widely known that Hillary Clinton would do anything to be president and it is possible that Obama’s life would be in greater danger of assassination if Hillary Clinton were his vice president than if she were not.

Flawed candidate Barack Obama also has a problem if he does not pick Hillary Clinton to be his vice president. Large portions of Hillary supporters have openly stated that they will support John McCain for president if Hillary is not the Democratic presidential nominee. Many, but not all of these people would likely support Obama if he chose Hillary to be his running mate.

Obama may eventually pick a VP to deflect from his woeful economic and foreign affairs inexperience. The man, after all, wants to raise taxes to Carter-era levels - all but assuring a steep recession, and have unconditional sit down chit-chats with third-world dictator thugs – elevating regimes around the world that are hostile to U.S. interests. Obama may want to make McCain’s age an issue in this election, but lets not forget that it was Obama that recently bowled a 37 and stated that he and his entourage had tried to visit all 57 States on the campaign trail. Any VP candidate that takes the spotlight away from Obama’s ineptness would serve him well in the short-term.

Flawed candidate John McCain has done just about everything possible to alienate himself from his Republican conservative base. Outside of being somewhat strong against terrorism, promising to appoint strict constructionist judges to the bench and pledging to not raise taxes, conservatives have been pushed aside as McCain appeals to more liberal Americans. McCain recently repudiated North Carolina Republicans for running anti-Obama commercials featuring the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, before acknowledging that he could not stop the N.C. GOP from airing the ads. McCain has angered some religious conservatives by refusing invitations to meet with Dr. James Dobson, leader of Focus on the Family in Colorado, and McCain has rejected the endorsement of John Hagee, an influential Texas preacher, who in turn withdrew his endorsement of McCain. McCain’s own self-admission that he doesn’t understand the economy and that, as president, he would refuse to allow oil drilling in the 19-million-acre ANWR region in Alaska, does not sit well with economic conservatives.

As the cost of oil has recently surpassed $133-a-barrel, with both major party candidates and environmentalists pledging to curtail the U.S. oil industry from drilling, Americans can expect to pay more for gas far into the foreseeable future. This is due to the simple law of supply and demand that anyone who has any comprehension of economics understands. To make matters worse, some in government have proposed a confiscatory ‘windfall profits tax’ against large profitable oil companies. This tax would ultimately have the effect of raising gas prices even further, since oil companies would simply pass on their added tax burdens to their customers at the pump. High gas prices and energy costs are issues that concern Americans most and neither candidate has any proposals to do anything about them.

The short list of McCain’s VP choices likely includes Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney. Huckabee governed as a liberal with high tax policies and soft-on-crime legislation. Having such a record is not likely to spark much enthusiasm in the Republican base. Likewise, while Romney is the clear choice of economic conservatives, some religious conservatives seem to have a problem with his Mormon faith. This is so even though Romney, in his personal and political life, has probably lived more closely to the Christian ideal than any of the other candidates that have run for the presidency. Others on McCain’s short list for VP are Florida’s Governor Charlie Crist and Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal.

Another wildcard in the presidential race is the Libertarian Party representative for president, former GOP Congressman Bob Barr. Barr won the Libertarian Party nomination on May 25th. While garnering only 3% of the presidential vote in a recent nationwide poll, Barr may be able to gather more votes down the road from disgruntled conservatives who may feel that they are not being well represented by McCain. It remains to be seen whether or not Bob Barr will play a spoiler role in this presidential race.